IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

Does your sunscreen work as well as it should? New report rates leading brands

Not all sunscreens are created equal, according to a new report from an independent consumer advocacy group.
/ Source: LiveScience

Not all sunscreens are created equal: Nearly three-quarters of sunscreens are either ineffective or contain chemicals that could harm your health, a new report finds.

The Environmental Working Group (EWG) released its 2017 Sunscreen Guide Tuesday, just in time for summer. The EWG is an independent advocacy group focused on public health and environmental issues based in Washington, D.C.

For the report, researchers at the EWG reviewed nearly 1,500 products, including sunscreens, moisturizers that contain SPF and lip balms, according to the group. Just over one-quarter of the 1,500 products met EWG's strict guidelines: about 300 sunscreens, just over 100 moisturizers and nearly 40 lip balms.

We apologize, this video has expired.

EWG researchers focused on five factors to evaluate each product.

The first thing the researchers looked at was whether the product contained ingredients that may be harmful to a person's health. In addition to studying the effects these ingredients could have on a person's skin, the researchers also looked at how the sunscreen was supposed to be applied. For example, a spray-on sunscreen could be harmful if inhaled, they noted.

The four factors remaining all related to how well the products worked, and included how well the products blocked both UVA andUVB rays (both of which can damage the skin and cause skin cancer), and how much a product's active ingredients break down in the sun (once the ingredients break down, they are no longer effective). They also examined the balance between UVA and UVB protection. A sunscreen's SPF, or sun-protection factor, refers only to how well the product blocks UVB rays, the EWG says.

The researchers gave each product a score of between 1 and 10; the lower the score, the better. In their guide, only products that received a score of 2 or lower are recommended.

Although the report concluded that just over a quarter of the products in the report met the high standards set by the EWG, in the past decade, there have been improvements in sunscreens.

SPF rating above 50 can give a false sense of security, according to the EWG.Getty Images stock

Why 'mineral only' sunscreen is so good

For example, the percentage of "mineral-only" sunscreens doubled from 17 percent of all sunscreens in 2007 to 34 percent in 2017. Mineral-only sunscreens are those that include zinc oxide or titanium dioxide as their active ingredients. These mineral ingredients are known as physical sunscreens — they sit on top of a person's skin and physically deflect the sun's rays, according to the Skin Cancer Foundation. Other sunscreens contain chemical ingredients; instead of deflecting the rays, they absorb the rays.

Mineral-only sunscreens are stable in sunlight (meaning that they don't break down). They protect against both UVA and UVB rays and don't often contain harmful ingredients, the EWG says.

The EWG also noted that nearly all sunscreens they analyzed for the new report block both UVA and UVB rays — in other words, the sunscreens are "broad spectrum."

In addition, the percentage of sunscreens containing the ingredient retinyl palmitate, a type of vitamin A, has decreased since 2010, from 40 percent to 14 percent, according to the report. Retinyl palmitate has been linked to skin tumors in animal studies, the EWG says.

Sunscreens for kids

The EWG report also highlighted the best and worst sunscreens for kids.

Although many products are advertised for kids or babies, the Food and Drug Administration doesn't set any specific criteria when it comes to children's sunscreens. This means that there are no differences between these products and those advertised for adults.

Top-rated sunscreens for kids

The EWG identified 19 sunscreens that made the cut as the best sunscreens for babies and kids. They include:

  • Aveeno Baby Continuous Protection Sensitive Skin Lotoin Sunscreen, SPF 50
  • Badger Baby Sunscreen Cream, SPF 30
  • California Baby Super Sensitive Sunscreen, SPF 30+
  • Kiss My Face Organics Baby Sunscreen, SPF 30
  • Neutrogena Pure & Free Baby Sunscreen, SPF 50

For the complete list, go here.

In addition to the products having the lowest possible score, the researchers also looked for lotions instead of sunscreen sticks (sunscreen sticks aren't well-applied, according to some studies), fragrance-free products and water-resistant products.

Lowest-rated sunscreens for kids

The sunscreens that came in at the bottom of the list contained ingredients that could be harmful (such as oxybenzone and retinyl palmitate), had very high SPFs or were spray sunscreens. They include:

  • Banana Boat Kids Continuous Spray Sunscreen, SPF 100
  • Coppertone Foaming Lotion Sunscreen Kids Wacky Foam, SPF 70
  • Coppertone Sunscreen Lotion Water Babies, SPF 70+
  • Neutrogena Pure & Free Baby Sunscreen, SPF 60+
  • Up & Up Sunscreen Sticks, SPF 55

For the complete list go here.

The EWG noted that "sky-high" SPFs, which include those over SPF 50, refer only to how well the products block UVB rays, not UVA rays. Because UVB rays are what make a person's skin turn red, they can give people a false sense of security: A person may think that just because his or her skin isn't reddening, no damage is being done, and it's OK to stay in the sun, the EWG says.

And spray-on sunscreens often aren't applied evenly, meaning a person can miss a spot, or apply too little in some areas, according to the report. In addition, inhaling these sunscreens may be risky.


Mom warns about sunscreen after 14-month-old daughter ends up in ER

Consumer Reports says these are the best sunscreens of 2017

See these epic sunscreen fails

Originally published on Live Science.