Brothers and Sisters: Moral Hazard

Published: May 5, 2008, 11:42 am

Tags: abc, balthazar ghetty, balthazarghetty, brothers and sisters, brothersandsisters, callista flockhart, callistaflockhart, dave annable, daveannable, emily vancamp, emilyvancamp, luke mcfarlane, lukemcfarlane, matthew rhys, matthewrhys, patricia wettig, patriciawettig, rach

Filed under: OpEd, Brothers and Sisters, Episode Reviews, Reality-Free(S02E15) "We should ask ourselves: 'What's the right thing to do?'" Holly Harper to Tommy WalkerSo, what are we to think of Holly? Is she a pathological liar and a scheming manipulator? A greedy opportunist? Or is she genuinely trying to do the right thing as she sees it, affair with William Walker not withstanding? Honestly, I can't make up my mind, but I am leaning toward seeing her as a flawed person who is doing her best. Lord knows, she could have taken her inheritance from William Walker and kissed the entire clan goodbye. Perhaps some see her as unable to let go, unable to stop until she has revenge on the Walkers for having William in ways she couldn't. But that seems a rather extreme pathology. It's much more interesting to view her as a complicated human being, which has certainly been supported on the show.Continue reading Brothers and Sisters: Moral Hazard Permalink Email

[ Full article ]

Blog link

Rating: 0

Comments