Decorate Your Home The Way You Always Wanted To
|
Title: clintons asleep at switch View count: 1712 Rating: 4.73 (117 ratings) Description: There is a bit of collective insanity going on here. The clinton years are proof certain of the deeply flawed, self-serving, deadly, clinton character: They are a demonstration in real time of a "legacy" that was incidentally a "presidency".... Madeleine Albright captured the essence of this dysfunctional presidency best when she explained why clinton couldn't go after bin Laden. According to Richard Miniter, the Albright revelation occurred at the cabinet meeting that would decide the disposition of the USS Cole bombing by al Qaeda [that is to say, that would decide to do what it had always done when a "bimbo" was not spilling the beans on the clintons: Nothing]. Only Clarke wanted to retaliate militarily for this unambiguous act of war. Albright explained that a [sham] Mideast accord would yield [if not peace for the principals, surely] a Nobel Peace Prize for clinton. Kill or capture bin Laden and clinton could kiss the 'accord' and the Peace Prize good-bye. If clinton liberalism, smallness, cowardice, corruption, perfidy--and, to borrow a phrase from Andrew Cuomo, clinton cluelessness--played a part, it was, in the end, the Nobel Peace Prize that produced the puerile pertinacity that enabled the clintons to shrug off terrorism's global danger. And now we are seriously thinking about putting these two deadly, self-serving defectives back in power? Are we nuts? "THE CLINTONS HAVE TROUBLE DISASSOCIATING PERSONAL INTEREST, RATIONAL INTEREST, AND JUSTICE." (Charles Krauthammer) Tags: bill, clinton, dangerous, defectives, failure, hillary, nobel, terrorism, utter, Author: miat1111 |
