IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

Cate Blanchett goes sans Photoshop for magazine cover

By Julia Rubin,StyleiteIntelligent Life — The Economist‘s lifestyle and culture magazine — went where few (but increasingly more!) publications have gone before: the unairbrushed cover.Cate Blanchett fronts the latest issue of the bi-monthly, a cover choice explained by Intelligent Life editor Tim de Lisle on the magazine’s website:When other magazines photograph actresses, they routin
Brave and beautiful: Actress Cate Blanchett went without makeup for the latest cover of Intelligent Life magazine.
Brave and beautiful: Actress Cate Blanchett went without makeup for the latest cover of Intelligent Life magazine.Intelligent Life / Today

By Julia Rubin,Styleite

Intelligent Life — The Economist‘s lifestyle and culture magazine — went where few (but increasingly more!) publications have gone before: the unairbrushed cover.

Cate Blanchett fronts the latest issue of the bi-monthly, a cover choice explained by Intelligent Life editor Tim de Lisle on the magazine’s website:

When other magazines photograph actresses, they routinely end up running heavily Photoshopped images, with every last wrinkle expunged. Their skin is rendered so improbably smooth that, with the biggest stars, you wonder why the photographer didn’t just do a shoot with their waxwork.

Cate Blanchett, by contrast, appears on our cover in her working clothes, with the odd line on her face and faint bags under her eyes. She looks like what she is — a woman of 42, spending her days in an office, her evenings on stage and the rest of her time looking after three young children. We can’t be too self-righteous about it, because, like anyone else who puts her on a cover, we are benefiting from her beauty and distinction. But the shot is at least trying to reflect real life. It’s a curious sign of the times that this has become something to shout about.

But the cover doesn’t just make a statement about Photoshop, it also makes one about the sometimes dicey ethics of magazine photography. Tim de Lisle explained: “Publishers want a recognizable person on the cover, with a real career; but they also want an empty vessel — for clothes and jewelry and makeup, which often seem to be supplied by the advertisers with the most muscle.”

We think Cate looks amazing, fine lines and all. She is, after all, genetically blessed. (She also appears to be wearing a little bit of makeup.) Of course, this isn’t a totally novel concept. Marie Claire featured an un-airbrushed (and supposedly makeup-free) Jessica Simpson on its May 2010 cover, Harper’s Bazaar featured a fairly natural-faced Lady Gaga for its May 2011 issue, and Glamour pledged to tone down its use of Photoshop. Make Up Forever even did an entire un-retouched ad campaign.

Still, we’re impressed.

What do you think of Cate Blanchett's newest magazine cover? And airbrushing in general?

More from Styleite: This Is What An Unretouched Makeup Campaign Looks Like

Kardashian Sisters Get Seriously Photoshopped In New Denim Line Ads

Does Taylor Swift’s CoverGirl Ad Deserve To Be Banned?