1. Headline
  1. Headline
Chris Helgren  /  Reuters file
Plaster models of heads, showing different parts of the brain, are seen in an exhibition at the Welcome Collection in London on March 27. A new theory says we're using less of our brain power.
By
updated 11/12/2012 2:03:25 PM ET 2012-11-12T19:03:25

Humans may be gradually losing intelligence, according to a new study.

The study, published Monday in the journal Trends in Genetics, argues that humans lost the evolutionary pressure to be smart once we started living in dense agricultural settlements several thousand years ago.

"The development of our intellectual abilities and the optimization of thousands of intelligence genes probably occurred in relatively non-verbal, dispersed groups of peoples (living) before our ancestors emerged from Africa," said study author Gerald Crabtree, a researcher at Stanford University, in a statement.

Since then it's all been downhill, Crabtree contends.

  1. More from TODAY.com
    1. Teen asked to cover up at school dance felt 'embarrassed and ashamed'

      “It was hard for me because that was a night I was supposed to feel really beautiful and special," she said. "This was rea...

    2. Crock-Pot, baked and more: Get your wings on for the Super Bowl!
    3. Meet the Puppy Bowl IX starting lineup before game day
    4. Holy home! Pennsylvania church gets flipped into a house
    5. Can Katy Perry top the greatest Super Bowl performances of all time?

The theory isn't without critics, with one scientist contacted by LiveScience suggesting that rather than losing our smarts, humans have just diversified them with various types of intelligence today. 

Life or death situations
Early humans lived or died by their spatial abilities, such as quickly making a shelter or spearing a saber-toothed tiger. Nowadays, though almost everyone has the spatial ability to do ostensibly simple tasks like washing dishes or mowing the lawn, such tasks actually require a lot of brainpower, the researchers note.

And we can thank our ancestors and the highly tuned mechanism of natural selection for such abilities. Meanwhile, the ability to play chess or compose poetry likely evolved as collateral effects.

But after the spread of agriculture, when our ancestors began to live in dense farming communities, the intense need to keep those genes in peak condition gradually waned.

And its unlikely that the evolutionary advantage of intelligence is greater than it was during our hunter-gatherer past, the paper argues.

"A hunter-gatherer who did not correctly conceive a solution to providing food or shelter probably died, along with his/her progeny, whereas a modern Wall Street executive that made a similar conceptual mistake would receive a substantial bonus and be a more attractive mate. Clearly, extreme selection is a thing of the past," the researchers write in the journal article.

Intelligence genes
Anywhere between 2,000 and 5,000 genes determine human intelligence, and these genes are particularly susceptible to harmful changes, or mutations, the researchers write. Based on knowledge of the rate of mutations, the team concludes that the average person harbors two intelligence-stunting genetic changes that evolved over the last 3,000 years.

  1. Science news from NBCNews.com
    1. Cosmic rays may spark Earth's lightning
      NOAA

      All lightning on Earth may have its roots in space, new research suggests.

    2. How our brains can track a 100 mph pitch
    3. Moth found to have ultrasonic hearing
    4. Quantum network could secure Internet

The hypothesis is counterintuitive at first. After all, across the world the average IQ has increased dramatically over the last 100 years, a phenomenon known as the Flynn Effect. But most of that jump probably resulted from better prenatal care, better nutrition and reduced exposure to brain-stunting chemicals such as lead, Crabtree argues.

But just because humans have more mutations in their intelligence genes doesn't mean we are becoming less brainy as a species, said psychologist Thomas Hills of the University of Warwick, who was not involved in the study. Instead, removing the pressure for everyone to be a superb hunter or gatherer may have allowed us to evolve a more diverse population with different types of smarts, he said.

"You don't get Stephen Hawking 200,000 years ago. He just doesn't exist," Hills told LiveScience. "But now we have people of his intellectual capacity doing things and making insights that we would never have achieved in our environment of evolutionary adaptation."

Follow LiveScience on Twitter @livescience. We're also on Facebook  and Google+.

© 2012 LiveScience.com. All rights reserved.

Discuss:

Discussion comments

,

More on TODAY.com

  1. Courtesy of Kristy Kimball

    Teen asked to cover up at school dance felt 'embarrassed and ashamed'

    1/28/2015 9:46:12 PM +00:00 2015-01-28T21:46:12
  1. Joe Liang / Courtesy of Anna Angenend

    This mom gets it: Funny photos totally nail the messy toddler years

    1/28/2015 5:08:00 PM +00:00 2015-01-28T17:08:00
  1. Nbc Newswire / Getty Images Contributor

    Ask Matt Lauer your questions in Thursday’s live Facebook chat

    1/28/2015 11:10:29 PM +00:00 2015-01-28T23:10:29
  1. Samantha Okazaki / TODAY

    Game on! Serve these delicious dips at your Super Bowl party

    1/28/2015 5:27:47 PM +00:00 2015-01-28T17:27:47