1. Headline
  1. Headline

Video: Rossen Reports: Background check mistakes cost jobs

  1. Closed captioning of: Rossen Reports: Background check mistakes cost jobs

    >>> back now at 7:41 with "rossen reports." finding a new job is hard enough but now experts say there may be a hidden flaw that can ruin your chance of getting hired. today national investigative correspondent jeff rossen is here with the details.

    >> good morning. we all know when you apply for a job most employers will do a criminal background check . we do them here. nothing to worry about, right? because you're not a criminal. well, think again. experts say the background check companies are causing innocent people to lose jobs, mistaking them for drug felons, armed robbers, even sex offenders . it happened to catherine taylor . a stay at home mom looking to get back to work. the red cross wanted to hire her. as an accountant.

    >> i was supposed to start work the following week.

    >> reporter: but then suddenly catherine 's job offer was yanked. a criminal background check had come back with a long rap sheet of drug felonies. the problem is, it wasn't her.

    >> i was devastated. it was like my whole world was just torn apart.

    >> reporter: the company hired to run the background check in 2006 , choicepoint, one of the biggest, mixed her up with this catherine taylor , a repeat drug offender with the same date of birth but nothing else in common. they didn't even live in the same state.

    >> i have never been convicted of anything, nonetheless have a traffic ticket.

    >> reporter: consumer advocates say these mistakes are happening far too often. take leonard smith . when he applied for a job the background check company, sterling info systems, confused him with this sex offender , who was in prison at the time. it also happened to james hines , an innocent dad. the background check company adp mixed him up with michael james hines , a convicted sex offender in a different state. they don't even have the same first name. the companies say accuracy is important, but errors do happen.

    >> consumers are losing jobs by the thousands every year because of bad background checks that are run on them.

    >> reporter: jim francis is an attorney specializing in these cases. he says too often background check companies rely solely on computers to match the data with no one checking to make sure the results are correct. a billion dollar industry, he says, that is well aware of the problem. if the companies know this problem exists, why not just fix it?

    >> they would have to spend money on personnel and instituting procedures which would carve into their profits.

    >> reporter: under federal law , the companies are required to use reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy.

    >> the error rate is less than 10%.

    >> we went straight to the industry group representing those companies.

    >> accuracy is paramount.

    >> reporter: how do you explain background companies coming back with a different date of birth, different state, just matching a first and last name in some cases. does that seem accurate to you?

    >> it -- what i will say to that is that the most important thing is to let viewers know how background checks are conducted. you're speaking of hypotheticals.

    >> reporter: we asked her about a real life example. i want to show you a picture. this woman's name is catherine taylor . she lives in arkansas and applied for a job with the local red cross . the background check comes back and says she has a long rap sheet of drug felonies. turns out they mistook her with this woman who lives in a different state. how does this happen?

    >> you know, if there are errors in a report individuals do have an opportunity to contest it so i'm sorry. i just don't know all the facts of that particular case.

    >> reporter: catherine did contest it but by the time choicepoint cleared it up, that job was long gone.

    >> they need to have tighter, stricter controls. you're talking about human lives. this has got to stop.

    >> the company that ran catherine taylor 's background check was bought by lexus nexus . they say their systems have since improved and now they have a 99.8% accuracy rate. experts say if this happens to you, you don't have many options, unfortunately. you can contact the background check company as catherine did and dispute it. the problem is, they have 30 days to investigate. by then the job could be long gone as it was with catherine . the only other option unfortunately, savannah, is to sue the company but once again the job isn't there when you want it. they just go down the list.

    >> doesn't remedy it if you don't get the job. thanks for bringing the story. appreciate

By
TODAY
updated 11/9/2012 7:41:57 AM ET 2012-11-09T12:41:57

Finding a new job is hard enough, but experts say there may be a hidden flaw when you apply, that can ruin your chance of getting hired. TODAY National Investigative Correspondent Jeff Rossen has the details.

  1. More from TODAY.com
    1. Mila Kunis,  Ashton Kutcher welcome baby girl

      Mila Kunis and Ashton Kutcher welcomed a baby girl Tuesday night, People magazine reported. No name was announced.

    2. 9 things we learned from Brian Williams' Facebook chat
    3. Plaza producer: TODAY's #PinkPower event was 'my best day on the job'
    4. Guess who's most likely to hand out candy, and which kind they've got
    5. Lunch box hero: You've got to see this dad's amazing napkin art

When you apply for a job, most employers will do a criminal background check. Nothing to worry about, right? Because you're not a criminal. Think again. Experts say those background check companies are causing innocent people to lose jobs, mistaken for drug felons, armed robbers, even sex offenders.

Have an idea for Rossen Reports? Email us by clicking here!

It happened to Catherine Taylor, a stay-at-home mom looking to get back to work. The Red Cross wanted to hire her as an accountant.

“I was supposed to start work the following week,” Taylor told us.

But suddenly, Catherine's job offer was yanked. A criminal background check had come back with a long rap sheet of drug felonies. The problem is, it wasn't her.

Read more investigative journalism from Rossen Reports

“I was devastated,” Taylor said. “It was like my whole world was just torn apart.”

The company hired to run the background check in 2006, Choicepoint, one of the biggest, had mixed her up with another Catherine Taylor, a repeat drug offender with same date of birth, but nothing else in common. They didn't even live in the same state.

“I have never been convicted of anything, (not even) a traffic ticket,” Taylor said.

Consumer advocates say these mistakes are happening far too often.

Take Leonard Smith. When he applied for a job, the background company, Sterling Infosystems, confused him with a sex offender who was in prison at the time.

It also happened to James Hines, an innocent dad. When he applied for a job, the background check company, ADP, confused him with Michael James Hines, a convicted sex offender in a different state. They don't even have the same first name.

Story: Rossen Reports: Are air-conditioning repairers being competent and honest?

The companies say accuracy is important, but errors do happen. 

“Consumers are losing jobs by the thousands because of the bad background checks that are run on them,” attorney Jim Francis told us.

Francis specializes in these cases. He says, too often, background check companies rely solely on computers to match the data, with no one checking to make sure the results are correct — a billion-dollar industry, he says, that is well aware of the problem. 

Story: Rossen Reports: Many backyard decks collapse, experts warn

So we asked him: If the companies know this problem exists, why not just fix it?

“They would have to spend money on personnel and instituting procedures, which would carve into their profits,” said Francis.

Under federal law, the companies are required to use "reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy.”

  1. More Rossen Reports
    1. Rossen Reports: Kids can sleep through smoke alarms, experts say
      TODAY
    2. Rossen Reports: Are child safety caps enough to keep kids out?
    3. Hotel chains devalue loyalty rewards points
    4. Rossen Reports: Potentially dangerous cars for sale
    5. How to check whether your vehicle has an unfixed safety recall

“The error rate is less than 10 percent,” said Montserrat Miller, an attorney who works for the National Association of Background Screening Professionals. “Accuracy is paramount.”

Video: Rossen reports: Are chimney cleaners taking advantage?

But how would they explain background companies coming back with a different date of birth, from a different state, just matching a first and last name in some cases?

“What I will say to that is that the most important thing is to let viewers know how background checks are conducted,” said Miller. “You're speaking hypotheticals.”

So we asked her about a real-life example. We showed her a picture of Catherine Taylor, the Arkansas woman who was mistaken for another woman who had a long rap sheet of drug felonies.

How did that happen?

Story: Rossen Reports: Popular smoke alarms may go off too late, experts warn

“I, you know, if there are errors in a report, individuals do have an opportunity to contest it,” said Miller. “So I don’t, I’m sorry I just don’t know the facts of that particular case that you just raised.”

Catherine did contest it, but by the time Choicepoint cleared it up, that job was long gone.

Story: Rossen Reports: Hidden stair flaws imperil kids

“They need to have stricter controls,” Taylor told us. “You're talking about human lives, their livelihood, the way that they want to provide for themselves and their families. This has got to stop.”

The company that ran Catherine Taylor's report was bought by Lexis Nexis. They say their systems have improved, and they now have a 99.8 percent accuracy rate.

Experts say that if this happens to you, you don't have many options. You can contact the background check company and dispute it. Problem is, they have 30 days to investigate. By then, the job could be long gone. The only other option is to sue.   

Click here to read statements to NBC News from LexisNexis and ADP.

Have an idea for a future edition of Rossen Reports? We want to hear from you! To send us your ideas, click here.

© 2013 MSNBC Interactive.  Reprints

Discuss:

Discussion comments

,

Most active discussions

  1. votes comments
  2. votes comments
  3. votes comments
  4. votes comments

More on TODAY.com

  1. Joan Lunden: 10 things I wish I knew before I was diagnosed with breast cancer

    From the moment you hear the words ‘You have breast cancer,’ it’s almost like you’re shot out of a cannon. Here are 10 things I wish I knew before I was diagnosed.

    10/1/2014 10:52:45 AM +00:00 2014-10-01T10:52:45
  2. Want to help? A guide to breast cancer charities

    In the United States an estimated 296,000 women and 2,240 men will be diagnosed with breast cancer this year and almost 40,000 women and 410 men will die of the disease. That's one death every 14 minutes, according to the National Breast Cancer Coalition.

    10/1/2014 10:45:11 AM +00:00 2014-10-01T10:45:11
  3. Samantha Okazaki / TODAY
  1. Nbc News

    9 things we learned from Brian Williams' Facebook chat

    10/2/2014 1:41:28 AM +00:00 2014-10-02T01:41:28
  1. Noel Vasquez / Getty Images Contributor

    Mila Kunis,  Ashton Kutcher welcome baby girl

    10/2/2014 1:24:09 AM +00:00 2014-10-02T01:24:09
  1. Kevin Lamarque / Reuters

    Secret Service director resigns amid scandal

    10/1/2014 7:30:52 PM +00:00 2014-10-01T19:30:52
  1. Texas Ebola patient had contact with kids

    Texas Gov. Rick Perry said in a press conference on Wednesday that “some school-age children” had been identified as having contact with the man diagnosed with the first case of Ebola in the United States. 

    10/1/2014 5:37:52 PM +00:00 2014-10-01T17:37:52