With oil prices down to roughly a third of peak levels last summer, OPEC oil producers met over the weekend to try to agree on cutting production to get prices back up again. So far, those efforts haven't succeeded.
- Ever Wonder Where the Property Brothers Live?
- History-Making Les Misérables Actor Kyle Jean-Baptiste Has Died at 21
- 'The Boat That Saved 400': How One Man Saved Hundreds of Lives During the Aftermath of Hurricane Katrina
- Jessa (Duggar) Seewald Speaks Out About Josh Duggar's Molestation and Cheating Scandals: 'You Just Have to Keep Your Focus and Trust God'
- Fourth Train Attack Hero Speaks Out For First Time Since Horrific Attack: I Turned to My Wife and Said 'Hide Yourself'
If OPEC can't push oil prices higher, doesn’t that mean this year's price spike was driven by greedy speculators after all?
I know everyone is worried about the financial issues right now, but why isn’t anyone talking about the falling oil prices and speculation? It seems like just another "bubble" that burst. In retrospect was the recent run-up caused by people/organizations looking for a double-digit return, just like housing, tech stocks, etc.?
— Jim E., Chesapeake, Va.
Falling oil prices are a financial issue at the moment. The sharp reversal in oil prices — which recently fell below $50 a barrel after peaking at roughly three times that level less than six months ago — is adding to worries about deflation.
The concern is that the price drop, along with the continuing drop in housing and stock prices — could touch off a downward spiral that would severely hamper the government’s efforts to get the economy moving again. (You can read more about deflation here .)
It’s true that speculators helped fuel the price run-up when billions of dollars piled into the futures market trying to find big returns. The recent exodus of that money helped accelerate the collapse. But these investors didn’t cause the spike — nor did they burst the bubble.
Investors are a powerful force in commodity markets and, on balance, a positive one. If you’re buying or selling something — whether because you intend to use it or just trade it for a profit — you want to deal with as many buyers and sellers as possible. That’s true whether you’re trying to sell junk from your attic on eBay, or buy a house, or sell a stock. The more bidders, the closer you can get to a true “market” price — whether you’re a buyer or seller.
This only works, however, if the market is functioning properly. The current financial mess is a result of a breakdown in the markets that supplied money for home loans; the people making the loans bore no risk because they sold them to investors (who didn’t take the time to look closely at what they were buying).
The river of money flowing from this broken credit market washed over the housing market and lifted house prices to unsustainable levels. Now that the bubble has burst, the market is still broken; lenders won’t lend until they’re convinced they’ve seen the worst. As long as house prices keep falling, we’re not there yet.
Some readers suspect that when oil prices spiked, that market was also broken. And some members of Congress favor tighter regulations on futures traders. If evidence can be found that the oil spike was the result of a broken market, more regulations may be needed. But, so far, we haven’t seen any proof of that. (Please forward any evidence to the contrary.)
There are, however, much better explanations for the oil price spike and subsequent collapse. Strong global growth brought a surge in demand for refined fuels, especially diesel fuel needed to move goods and power the machinery behind a global building boom.
Demand for diesel fuel also played a role that got little attention during the run-up. A number of readers at the time wondered why diesel had become more costly than gasoline — a reversal of the traditional price trend. The reason was that in 2007 new air quality regulations required refiners to dramatically cut the levels of sulfur and produce so-called Ultra-Low Sulfur Diesel.
For most refiners, that meant using light, sweet crude, which is low in sulfur. Though overall crude supplies kept up with demand, much of the new crude coming to market was too sour (too high in sulfur) for diesel refiners. That added to the demand for light, sweet crude — the most widely used benchmark for oil prices. (Lower grades of crude sold for less.) Government purchases of light, sweet crude for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve tightened demand further.
Other factors played a role in this year's price spike. A falling dollar boosted the price of crude in dollar terms. Political tension between Middle East oil producers and Western consuming countries raised fears that crude might be used as a weapon.
Many of these trends have made an about-face in the course of a few months.
Today, the dollar is soaring as investors seek the shelter of U.S. Treasuries. A big drop in consumer spending and manufacturing has cut demand for refined fuels. Until recently, the high price of gasoline forced many people to cut back.
These trends could reverse course again. If the Fed floods the system with too much money, confidence in the dollar could weaken. OPEC is working to cut crude production and tighten up the world’s supplies. Pirates are seizing oil tankers on the high seas. A sharp cold snap in the U.S. and Europe could bring another spike in demand.
And now that pump prices have fallen sharply (roughly $1.90 a gallon last week — about half the peak last summer), drivers have been getting back into their old routine, and demand is returning to pre-spike levels.
If that keeps up, it may not take long for prices to begin heading higher again.
I keep reading about how the U.S. borrows $700 billion from China to buy oil from countries that don't like us (Middle East). Is it the federal government (taxpayers) buying the oil? And, do we then give it to ExxonMobil, BP, et al so they can refine it and sell it to us as fuel? If that's the case it's pure profit for Big Oil! Also, concerning the Strategic Oil Reserve, who owns it and who refines it if it's needed? I've never heard or read answers to these questions.
— Ralph T., Michigan
You got the flows of money and oil going more or less in the right direction. But they’re not directly connected.
As the biggest foreign holder of U.S. Treasury debt, China has been a big lender to U.S. taxpayers. As of September, China owned about $585 billion in U.S. debt, followed by Japan ($573 billion) and Britain ($338 billion). Oil-exporting countries hold about $182 billion.
A very small portion of the money raised by our government is spent to stockpile crude oil for emergencies. This Strategic Petroleum Reserve is held in large underground formations near the Gulf Coast, where about half of U.S. refining capacity is based. But at 700 million barrels, it’s pretty well topped off. Last year, the government bought about 7.8 million barrels. So even at an average price of, say $100 a barrel, Uncle Sam only spent about $780 million on crude, compared with the billions raised by selling debt.
And no, the oil is not handed over to oil companies if the government taps the reserve in emergencies. In the past, companies have paid for the oil — or borrowed it and replaced it when the emergency was over.
In any case, it’s not a lot of oil. With U.S. demand for crude oil running at about 20 million barrels a day, the SPR would last us a little over a month before it ran out.
© 2013 msnbc.com Reprints