1. Headline
  1. Headline
updated 5/4/2007 9:31:02 PM ET 2007-05-05T01:31:02

The children of a photographer who took famous pictures of Marilyn Monroe did not violate the star’s rights by selling pictures without her heirs’ consent, a federal judge has ruled.

  1. More Entertainment stories
    1. Autistic ballerina dances her way into hearts

      In a popular YouTube video, the beaming little ballerina dances an entire four-minute routine seemingly perfectly, matchin...

    2. Every on-screen drink in 'Mad Men' in 5 minutes
    3. See the 'Dancing' stars' most memorable moves
    4. Emmy's biggest snubs? Cranston, Hamm, more
    5. 'Toy Story' toys burn up in prank on mom

U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon said in a decision dated Wednesday and made public Friday that a company led by three children of the late photographer, Sam Shaw, did not violate the rights of Monroe’s estate by using pictures of her on T-shirts marketed and sold in Indiana.

Millions of dollars were believed to be at stake, in part because Shaw’s photographs include some of the most famous pictures of Monroe, including ones of her standing over a subway grate, her skirt blowing upward, for the 1955 film “The Seven Year Itch.”

The Shaw Family Archives Ltd. had asked the court to rule that a 1994 law did not create post-mortem publicity rights for Marilyn Monroe LLC. The latter company is led by Anna Strasberg, the wife of Monroe’s producer, Lee Strasberg, who received the bulk of the star’s estate. He died in 1982.

The Archives’ case hinged in part on a 1994 Indiana law that established a right to publicity extending for 100 years after the subject’s death. The case was first litigated in Indiana before being transferred to Manhattan.

Monroe died Aug. 5, 1962. Her will did not bequeath a right of publicity.

Slideshow: Celebrity Sightings “As a result, any publicity rights she enjoyed during her lifetime were extinguished at her death,” the judge wrote.

Orin Snyder, a lawyer for Marilyn Monroe LLC, said the company was considering an appeal. A lawyer for the Shaw heirs did not immediately return a phone call.

At issue in the case was the sale of a T-shirt at a Target store in Indianapolis last Sept. 6 bearing a picture of Monroe and the inscription “Shaw Family Archives” on the inside label and tag.

The dispute also centered on the maintenance of a Web site by the Shaw Family Archives through which customers could buy licenses for the use of Monroe’s picture, image and likeness for various commercial products.

© 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Discuss:

Discussion comments

,

Most active discussions

  1. votes comments
  2. votes comments
  3. votes comments
  4. votes comments

More on TODAY.com

  1. TODAY

    video Utah town celebrates holidays early for little boy fighting leukemia

    10/25/2014 6:37:54 PM +00:00 2014-10-25T18:37:54
  1. TODAY

    video Meet a couple who fell in love, got engaged, on Instagram

    10/25/2014 6:12:18 PM +00:00 2014-10-25T18:12:18
  1. TODAY

    video 'Make a Difference Day' encourages millions to get out and give back

    10/25/2014 2:33:32 PM +00:00 2014-10-25T14:33:32
  1. United Features Syndicate; Evere

    These are the best Halloween TV movies and specials to watch

    10/25/2014 4:21:23 PM +00:00 2014-10-25T16:21:23
  1. Chris Pizzello / AP

    Katy Perry turns 30! 13 times we celebrated singer's colorful style

    10/25/2014 12:39:21 PM +00:00 2014-10-25T12:39:21